Raila Odinga, who got here second in Kenya’s presidential election, has gone to courtroom to problem the consequence, describing it as “fraudulent”.
In a scathing 70-page authorized argument, he alleges there was a pre-planned effort to change the result.
Based on the electoral fee, Mr Odinga took 48.8% of the vote, dropping to William Ruto’s 50.5%.
An unbiased monitoring organisation stated the fee’s ultimate consequence was consistent with its personal projection.
Nonetheless, 4 of the seven electoral commissioners refused to endorse the result, alleging that the best way the ultimate outcomes had been tallied was “opaque”.
The seven judges on the Supreme Court docket can have 14 days to make a ruling.
Crowds of Mr Odinga’s supporters sang and chanted outdoors the courtroom in a suburb of the capital, Nairobi, because the presidential candidate arrived to ship the doc, together with dozens of containers of proof.
His authorized petition, one among greater than 5 handed over, described the alleged try to change the ultimate consequence as “premeditated, illegal and legal”.
Calls Impartial Electoral and Boundaries Fee (IEBC) chairperson Wafula Chebukati “rogue”
Alleges he was concerned within the plan to “safe a fraudulent consequence”
Says the plan was carried out with Mr Ruto’s data however doesn’t present proof to again this up
Raises questions concerning the tallying course of
Says there may be proof that the outcomes from some polling stations had been altered
Argues that the voter turnout determine was manipulated so Mr Ruto didn’t have to enter a second-round run-off.
Neither Mr Ruto nor Mr Chebukati have responded to the allegations.
Talking after handing the petition over to the Supreme Court docket, Mr Odinga stated “corruption cartels” had been undermining democracy, however didn’t specify who he meant.
This was the fifth time that the 77 12 months outdated had run for president. Beforehand he had been the opposition candidate, however this time he was backed by outgoing President Uhuru Kenyatta.
For the third time in a row he has gone to courtroom to get an final result overturned.
In 2017, the veteran politician efficiently challenged the results of that 12 months’s presidential election, which he misplaced to Mr Kenyatta, and the Supreme Court docket ordered a re-run. The case highlighted logistical points in the best way the outcomes had been collated.
Nonetheless, in 2013 his problem was dismissed.
This time the IEBC tried to make the outcomes course of as clear as attainable by publishing the polling station tallies as quickly as they had been obtainable.
The unbiased Elections Statement Group did its personal tally and stated its estimates had been in keeping with what the electoral fee revealed.
Every week in the past, there have been chaotic scenes on the nationwide tallying centre moments earlier than the ultimate results of the 9 August ballot was about to be learn out.
A few of Mr Odinga’s political allies stormed the stage and scuffles broke out. Two electoral commissioners had been injured and 4 others left the compound to carry a press convention to denounce the result.
However, Mr Chebukati proceeded with the announcement and handed Mr Ruto the certificates confirming that he was the winner.
The election fee head stated he had defied threats to carry out his obligation of saying outcomes based on the need of the folks, whereas Mr Ruto hailed him as a “hero”.
Final week, Mr Ruto stated he would respect the courtroom course of, which is a part of the nation’s electoral regulation.
“I am a democrat. I imagine within the rule of regulation. I respect our establishments,” he instructed journalists.
Daniel Elton, senior editor at Wahu Times, writes about politics and policy with a focus on climate advocacy. Daniel previously at the New Republic and, and Self. Daniel can be reached by email.